|
Post by Gambit on Jul 14, 2011 19:39:42 GMT -5
Welcome to the forum you old Fakir.
|
|
|
Post by harrypalmer on Aug 1, 2011 14:46:17 GMT -5
I wonder if Bond 23 will be lighter or will a miserable troubled Bond run around dispatching members of the Quantum gang!
|
|
|
Post by 009 on Aug 8, 2011 19:47:33 GMT -5
I wonder if Bond 23 will be lighter or will a miserable troubled Bond run around dispatching members of the Quantum gang! The next film will be more of the same except with moneypenny.
|
|
|
Post by John Drake on Aug 11, 2011 20:16:40 GMT -5
I wonder if Bond 23 will be lighter or will a miserable troubled Bond run around dispatching members of the Quantum gang! The next film will be more of the same except with moneypenny. Sadly, that is probably true. Still doesn't make any sense to bring Craig back.
|
|
|
Post by Van der Valk on Oct 15, 2011 5:33:02 GMT -5
Any news on the tone of Bond 23, or "Skyfall".
Is it more of an adventure rather than dark thriller?
|
|
|
Post by Gambit on Oct 16, 2011 18:18:20 GMT -5
With Sam Mendes directing I don't think this is going to be Moonraker.
|
|
|
Post by James on Oct 20, 2011 18:30:25 GMT -5
Skyfall. Ha ha! I wonder if that title is just a cunning ruse.
|
|
|
Post by Cpt. Sir Dominic Flandry on Dec 6, 2012 12:15:25 GMT -5
Having watched Craig's painful delivery of the Brosnaesque jokes in Skyfall and the cuff link tightening bit I'd say that Craig cannot make a lighter Bond movie.
|
|
|
Post by Gambit on Dec 12, 2012 18:24:50 GMT -5
With Sam Mendes directing I don't think this is going to be Moonraker. Amazingly wise words from Gambit there.
|
|
|
Post by Van der Valk on Dec 17, 2012 10:42:57 GMT -5
Well Skyfall did include some one-liners but it was still a grim thriller.
|
|
|
Post by John P. Drake on Aug 30, 2013 13:16:59 GMT -5
No, Craig can't make a "lighter" movie because he said it himself he prefers those soap opera genres instead of manly actions who has the balls to take control of anything that faces him. He says he can't do "superhero" stuff. Anyone who speaks for Craig does not know what Bond actually is about. Even Fleming who wasn't happy with Connery at first, was impressed later and changed the aspect of his character into the direction of The cinematic Bond. And please, stop saying that this Cr-egg resembles Fleming's character, they have nothing in common. The former is incredibly incompetent who couldn't handle a single job assigned to him to accomplish. He said all the previous Bonds are "uncool and campy", because he wants it to be some Jason Bourne clone that appeals only to wrist slitting emos. That being said.
|
|