|
|
Post by Van der Valk on May 28, 2012 5:48:43 GMT -5
I believe Pierce Brosnan could play Bond again.
He is 59 two years older than Roger Moore in A View To A Kill.
Also I think he looks a bit younger for his age than Roger Moore did.
I would ideally like a younger candidate for Bond but it's interesting to think that Brosnan could still play him.
|
|
|
|
Post by drfanshawe on May 28, 2012 14:50:44 GMT -5
Yes he could.
|
|
|
|
Post by harrypalmer on May 29, 2012 11:17:41 GMT -5
Yes - he looks younger than Connery in Never Say Never Again and Moore in A View To A Kill!
|
|
|
|
Post by garyseven on Jul 6, 2012 8:58:32 GMT -5
He looks younger than Daniel Craig does in the Skyfall on set photos.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gambit on Jul 18, 2012 14:27:34 GMT -5
I was watching The Ghost Writer (sic?) the other week and even though that film is only a few years old Brosnan looks more or less the same as he did in DAD.
|
|
|
|
Post by 009 on Jul 25, 2012 21:09:03 GMT -5
Not now he couldn't.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ranjit 007 on Aug 11, 2012 4:58:06 GMT -5
Pierce Brosnan was not too old for a Bond movie in 2006. Those who supported Daniel Craig's casting as Bond said that a younger actor was needed to replace Brosnan who was too old which I didn't agree with. |
|
|
|
Post by 009 on Aug 18, 2012 15:59:54 GMT -5
Well, 2006 was another matter. I'm sure he could have done one back then.
|
|
