alvin
Commander
Posts: 430
|
Post by alvin on May 15, 2010 14:33:34 GMT -5
please show me when and where in this respectable forum that i expressing a bizzare idolatry of Craig ;D I can tell you Chuck that my buddies and I look at your posts with awe. Every single post you have basically expresses your devotion to Daniel Craig. That is unbelievable. I don't know where you get your emotional strength to do that. But then I think it goes back to your transformation, the way Daniel has made you in touch with your true self. If idolatry is your way of expressing that you're into Daniel, then I don't see anything wrong with that. He-he, Eon will have a tough time replacing Daniel if they even do such a thing. No actor in the world has the kind of effect that Daniel has on the modern progressive man. |
|
alvin
Commander
Posts: 430
|
Post by alvin on May 15, 2010 14:41:48 GMT -5
I like Craig acting ;D and why you connecting it with sexual orientation? is this your best response ?;D how come someone like Daniel Craig's Bond film considered weird??? btw i am heterosexual ;D i think you are the one have to face the reallity ;D I disagree with Carribean Jack on his negative view of QOS but I agree with him that this is not about your sexual orientation. This is about your liberation. I can tell you that one of my buddies thinks you're a good example of a changed man, somebody that got in touch with his inner self. That's the power of daniel Craig's stardom. He can make audiences come to terms with themselves. I don't think any of the actors mentioned as potential Bonds has that quality. I don't see that at all in Sam Worthington or all those others like Christian Bale. |
|
|
|
Post by caribbeanjack on May 15, 2010 15:17:53 GMT -5
you hilarious too ;D well i see your arguments is an utter failure too ;D you brought that up because you can't provide a better argument . Your response "while expressing a bizarre idolatry of Craig" ;D is prove your lack understading about an issue Reasonable people with dignity wouldn't response in that way ;D i haven't seen any attempt from you either ;D ;D ;D ;D please show me when and where in this respectable forum that i expressing a bizzare idolatry of Craig ;D well i have the same opinion about you too  well here you go again pal, weak argument ;D, you can do better I enjoy the fact that QOS is a good film You'll have to do better too ;D thanks God you don't even favor Brosnan ;D welcome to the club ;D GIVE ME FIVE  Formerbondfan (and others also) also has Craig hating routine, Somebody's got to get a retraining order on FBF to keep FBF away from Brosnan and Craig please make your research much deeper, can you tell me what the EXACT FIGURES the HUGE MARKETING EXPENDITURES of QOS? Razzies award is a fair judgment and expression (not just opinion), of how awfull performance of an actor/actress . Brosnan is nominated as WORST SCREEN COUPLE in his bond film By Using your logic if you seriously want take the media write about Craig's Bond , you should take razzies seriously too because Razzies vote came from Journalist, Cinema fan, and professionals from the film industry. i know that before you telling my by the way Forget it, Chuck. You've failed. Every single response you made is laughable. And you essentially contradict yourself in each one. Even more laughable is that you've basically reiterated every point I made, attempting to use it as your own comeback, which is truly weak and pitiful. It's over, Chuck. You haven't proved anything substantial to make your case. I particularly found it amusing that you refuse to acknowledge the EW article on the bloated cost of QOS by insisting that I need to come up with exact figures. That has got to be the most absurd thing I've ever seen from a guy attempting to engage in a debate. Do you truly think that sort of information (budget details/balance sheets of a studio) are available to the public? Even journalists can't get hold of that info, which is why no details have been mentioned in news articles. But on this point, if you're so fixated on the budget of QOS, you should take the initiative and do the research to counter that EW article. Meanwhile, at least you've got the other guy Alvin to comfort you. Have a look at his posts. He believes in you, and together you'll find your happiness in that paradise where you're both free "to be into Daniel Craig," as he frequently mentions. Hey, may be he's even got the budget numbers of QOS. I hope you do stick around because you're like the court jester who never fails to amuse. |
|
|
|
Post by chuck007 on May 15, 2010 23:37:22 GMT -5
You've failed too ;D Your response you made is laughable too  ;D I win this debate have you? ;D Well no one should stupidly said that a film have financial failure if they don't have the exact figures . without the exact figures your statement of QOS was a financial failure is totally speculative So the statement QOS is a financial failure is a joke at best , how come $586,090,727 is a financial failure? because the production cost $200,000,000? and you said speculatively the marketing budget would make them loss. Ironically you don't have the exact figures about the marketing but dare to say QOS a financial failure You guys who said QOS a financial failures who should take the iniative, try to prove me wrong pal, and use an accurate information please |
|
|
|
Post by caribbeanjack on May 16, 2010 9:25:55 GMT -5
You've failed too ;D Your response you made is laughable too ;D I win this debate have you? ;D Well no one should stupidly said that a film have financial failure if they don't have the exact figures . without the exact figures your statement of QOS was a financial failure is totally speculative So the statement QOS is a financial failure is a joke at best , how come $586,090,727 is a financial failure? because the production cost $200,000,000? and you said speculatively the marketing budget would make them loss. Ironically you don't have the exact figures about the marketing but dare to say QOS a financial failure You guys who said QOS a financial failures who should take the iniative, try to prove me wrong pal, and use an accurate information please Forget, Chuckster. You're a loser. I've cited sources; you've failed to show information to back up your assertion. And once again you're just reiterating all my responses, trying to use them as your comebacks. Weak. You really have nothing to say and you're wasting everyone's time at this forum. You've also got serious communication problems and the concept of rational thinking is way over head. At least you can find comfort in the fact that Alvin finds your illiterate babble inspiring. |
|
FormerBondFan
00 Agent
Posts: 5,455
Favourite James Bond Films: The Dark Knight Trilogy, Mission: Impossible and any upcoming action films starring Pierce Brosnan (no, it's not James Bond which is good because he'll need it to expand his reputation as an actor, especially in the action realm)
Favourite Films: Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Star Trek, The Dark Knight Trilogy, Harry Potter, Middle-Earth, The Matrix, Mission: Impossible
|
Post by FormerBondFan on May 16, 2010 9:28:09 GMT -5
You've failed too ;D Your response you made is laughable too ;D I win this debate have you? ;D Well no one should stupidly said that a film have financial failure if they don't have the exact figures . without the exact figures your statement of QOS was a financial failure is totally speculative So the statement QOS is a financial failure is a joke at best , how come $586,090,727 is a financial failure? because the production cost $200,000,000? and you said speculatively the marketing budget would make them loss. Ironically you don't have the exact figures about the marketing but dare to say QOS a financial failure You guys who said QOS a financial failures who should take the iniative, try to prove me wrong pal, and use an accurate information please Forget, Chuckster. You're a loser. I've cited sources; you've failed to show information to back up your assertion. And once again you're just reiterating all my responses, trying to use them as your comebacks. Weak. You really have nothing to say and you're wasting everyone's time at this forum. You've also got serious communication problems and the concept of rational thinking is way over head. At least you can find comfort in the fact that Alvin finds your illiterate babble inspiring. And Captain Jack Sparrow wins again! |
|
|
|
Post by chuck007 on May 16, 2010 12:10:21 GMT -5
I'm a winner same like you Carribeanjackster you cited E&W as considerable sources? Your assertion "QOS is Financial failure" is not backed up considerable sources either. Entertainment weekly? well, your comment also just reiterating too, ;D i have a good enjoyable conversation with you maybe i am,but at least when i'm not agree with someone, i'll never tell them "you're coming across as a guy whose stuck in a basement with a creepy unrequited infatuation on the actor" or "I understand that you've got some weird idolatry going on with Craig and that your sexual orientation is your business" what kind of communication that you have here ;D You mention QOS had cost of the over-hyped marketing campaign but don't know how much exactly the figures?  if YOU HAVE the rational thinking you would be not so ignorant about the commercial success of QOS Reasonable people with dignity wouldn't comment that way ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
|
|
Post by caribbeanjack on May 16, 2010 14:12:20 GMT -5
I'm a winner same like you Carribeanjackster you cited E&W as considerable sources? Your assertion "QOS is Financial failure" is not backed up considerable sources either. Entertainment weekly? well, your comment also just reiterating too, ;D i have a good enjoyable conversation with you maybe i am,but at least when i'm not agree with someone, i'll never tell them "you're coming across as a guy whose stuck in a basement with a creepy unrequited infatuation on the actor" or "I understand that you've got some weird idolatry going on with Craig and that your sexual orientation is your business" what kind of communication that you have here ;D You mention QOS had cost of the over-hyped marketing campaign but don't know how much exactly the figures? if YOU HAVE the rational thinking you would be not so ignorant about the commercial success of QOS Reasonable people with dignity wouldn't comment that way ;D ;D ;D ;D Give it up, Chuck. You're useless. Again, you're just repeating what I said, trying to use my comments for some kind of comeback. You have nothing to say. You haven't presented anything informative. You're just wasting everyone's time. |
|
|
|
Post by Gambit on Aug 1, 2010 18:17:27 GMT -5
I think if DC stood down after 2 films it would be like Dalton in that he'd announce it just before they were ready to get moving on the film rather than during the break. Dalton waited until 1994 to release something saying he wanted to move on.
|
|
|
|
Post by garyseven on Aug 21, 2010 5:31:53 GMT -5
I think if DC stood down after 2 films it would be like Dalton in that he'd announce it just before they were ready to get moving on the film rather than during the break. Dalton waited until 1994 to release something saying he wanted to move on. If Daniel Craig comes back after a 5 year break, then he will have to make a fourth. What is the point of making a one-off Craig Bond then relaunching the series? It would be sensible to have a new Bond. The break provides a great opportunity to relaunch the series after the reboot concept collapsed. |
|
FormerBondFan
00 Agent
Posts: 5,455
Favourite James Bond Films: The Dark Knight Trilogy, Mission: Impossible and any upcoming action films starring Pierce Brosnan (no, it's not James Bond which is good because he'll need it to expand his reputation as an actor, especially in the action realm)
Favourite Films: Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Star Trek, The Dark Knight Trilogy, Harry Potter, Middle-Earth, The Matrix, Mission: Impossible
|
Post by FormerBondFan on Aug 21, 2010 9:21:27 GMT -5
If Daniel Craig comes back after a 5 year break, then he will have to make a fourth. I hope not. Is it possible Babs would give away Bond to someone? |
|
|
|
Post by harrypalmer on Aug 21, 2010 13:16:00 GMT -5
If Daniel Craig comes back after a 5 year break, then he will have to make a fourth. I hope not. Is it possible Babs would give away Bond to someone? Not a chance. She doesn't need the money and it's a family business. |
|
FormerBondFan
00 Agent
Posts: 5,455
Favourite James Bond Films: The Dark Knight Trilogy, Mission: Impossible and any upcoming action films starring Pierce Brosnan (no, it's not James Bond which is good because he'll need it to expand his reputation as an actor, especially in the action realm)
Favourite Films: Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Star Trek, The Dark Knight Trilogy, Harry Potter, Middle-Earth, The Matrix, Mission: Impossible
|
Post by FormerBondFan on Aug 21, 2010 13:39:36 GMT -5
I hope not. Is it possible Babs would give away Bond to someone? Not a chance. She doesn't need the money and it's a family business. Cubby nearly sold Bond in the early 90s. |
|
|
|
Post by Jake on Aug 22, 2010 12:48:45 GMT -5
Cubby was probably tired then and had spent a lifetime in the industry. Barbara is still quite young. It would probably kill her to to see someone else making Bond films and having no say or control over them.
|
|
FormerBondFan
00 Agent
Posts: 5,455
Favourite James Bond Films: The Dark Knight Trilogy, Mission: Impossible and any upcoming action films starring Pierce Brosnan (no, it's not James Bond which is good because he'll need it to expand his reputation as an actor, especially in the action realm)
Favourite Films: Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Star Trek, The Dark Knight Trilogy, Harry Potter, Middle-Earth, The Matrix, Mission: Impossible
|
Post by FormerBondFan on Aug 22, 2010 13:31:12 GMT -5
Because Babs has all the Bond rights, we will never see an unofficial Bond film.
|
|
