Pierce Back In Action!

[chuck007]

Well, he did just star in Mamma Mia!, which was actually bigger than QOS.

Mamma mia wasn't brosnan movies as lead actor

It would be kind've hard to top that one.

Mamma mia was an overrated movie

He did it for years as 007 and now appears content to explore less commercial projects.

so does Craig ;D and any other previous bond actor before Brosnan.

(Ironically, since leaving Bond, he actually enjoys better reviews than Craig.)

;D Brosnan got razzies award ;D

[poirot]

Jun 12, 2010 22:00:55 GMT -5 chuck007 said:

Brosnan got razzies award ;D

Are you saying Brosnan at his worst managed to gross more than Craig? I hadn't thought of it like that, but you're right.

[chuck007]

Are you saying Brosnan at his worst managed to gross more than Craig? I

Mamma mia was gross more not because of Brosnan
even without Brosnan Mamma mia could sell more
when and what film brosnan's show his best? ;D


Brosnan is and always a mediocre actor ;D

[FormerBondFan]

Jun 13, 2010 0:16:19 GMT -5 chuck007 said:

Are you saying Brosnan at his worst managed to gross more than Craig? I

Mamma mia was gross more not because of Brosnan
even without Brosnan Mamma mia could sell more

Brosnan is and always a mediocre actor ;D

Do you always have to come here and bother Pierce around on his acting? This is our turf, and I'm in the middle of the a discussion with Poirot, Alec 007, and all other fellow Anti-Craigss regarding this thread. If you don't mind, there's a Steven Seagal "Fat" Discussion thread in the off-topic section, and I started the thread just for you. If you want to bash someone, go bash Seagal instead. And look at this video and get yourself a laugh at this washed out fatso:



Since we're off-topic here, let's discuss this at Fat Seagal thread in the off-topic section, shall we?

[chuck007]

Do you always have to come here and bother Pierce around on his acting?

because his acting is awful ;D and he deserved that

If you want to bash someone, go bash Seagal instead.

Seagal fight better than Pierce Brosnan
and why it become serious issue to you when someone bashing Brosnan?

[FormerBondFan]

Jun 13, 2010 0:40:33 GMT -5 chuck007 said:

because his acting is awful ;D and he deserved that

I assume you didn't watch Evelyn then.

Seagal fight better than Pierce Brosnan
and why it become serious issue to you when someone bashing Brosnan?

Seagal fight better....perhaps we can agree here. I know you may disagree with on this, but Seagal seems fights better than any of the Bonds. Just my opinion though.

Anyway, I don't care if you hate Pierce or not, but we don't need to be lectured by the likes of you a billion times on the same issue. Since your blond friend arrive, all of us here are seeking a refuge and a home so we can free-speech. You may think this website and DCINB are made for those who prefers OTT Bond films like M and DAD and those who prefer Brosnan as Bond prefer OTT Bonds. Well, you are wrong. We all wanted same thing...a realistic and gritty Bond, but it's your friend DC and a reboot concept we have a disagreement over. So if you don't mind, I'm in a middle of a conversation with poirot here.

[FormerBondFan]

And poirot......where did we last talked about anyway?

[caribbeanjack]

Jun 12, 2010 22:00:55 GMT -5 chuck007 said:

Mamma mia wasn't brosnan movies as lead actor

He was basically the main leading man, though. Since you're illiterate, you obviously couldn't read the posters, which clearly showed that his name was second to Meryl Streep--because, again, he was really the main leading man.

Mamma mia was an overrated movie

And so? Bottom line: it made a ton of money. Deal with reality.

;D Brosnan got razzies award ;D

Which nobody takes seriously. It's a tongue-in-cheek awards. Also, awards in general don't exactly do a favor for many actors. Just look at Stallone or Kevin Costner. There was a time when they were the darling of the Hollywood system, and they won Academy Awards. But now they tend to get trashed. Just look at what Costner went through with Waterworld. Accolades from Awards are so transitory.

[caribbeanjack]

Jun 13, 2010 0:40:33 GMT -5 chuck007 said:

Do you always have to come here and bother Pierce around on his acting?

because his acting is awful ;D and he deserved that

If you want to bash someone, go bash Seagal instead.

Seagal fight better than Pierce Brosnan
and why it become serious issue to you when someone bashing Brosnan?

Dude, you're blabbing the same things over and over. You have nothing to say. It's one thing not to admire a particular actor and then back up your assertions with a balanced critical discussion. But all you do is repeat the same deliberate trashing of Brosnan. As formerbond fan points out, "Do you always have to come here and bother Pierce around on his acting?" Again, you have zero critical-thinking skills and have nothing to say except to bash Brosnan with ridiculous comments. It's actually getting creepy. It's an obsession on your part, like a homo-erotic fascination for the actor but it's turned into frustration for you because it's unrequited love. You need help, dude. But this forum is not the place to vent you homo-erotic frustrations.

[FormerBondFan]

Jun 13, 2010 10:45:24 GMT -5 caribbeanjack said:

Which nobody takes seriously. It's a tongue-in-cheek awards. Also, awards in general don't exactly do a favor for many actors. Just look at Stallone or Kevin Costner. There was a time when they were the darling of the Hollywood system, and they won Academy Awards. But now they tend to get trashed. Just look at what Costner went through with Waterworld. Accolades from Awards are so transitory.

I wish Seagal got more Razzies than Costner and Stallone.

[chuck007]

He was basically the main leading man, though. Since you're illiterate, you obviously couldn't read the posters, which clearly showed that his name was second to Meryl Streep--because, again, he was really the main leading man.

my fault then ;D i never see carefully the poster like you then, i only watch the movie, and to me after watch the movie, Brosnan were just supporting actor (maybe you disagree with me)

And so? Bottom line: it made a ton of money. Deal with reality.

so did QOS and CR, deal with it

Which nobody takes seriously.

it's your opinion then

Also, awards in general don't exactly do a favor for many actors.

for some maybe, for some others maybe not,it depend though.

[chuck007]

Dude, you're blabbing the same things over and over.

Formerbondfans also blabbing the same things over and over too about Craig, why don't you

You have nothing to say. It's one thing not to admire a particular actor and then back up your assertions with a balanced critical discussion.

well this forum is not a scientific forum, i don't even take it seriously your ridicolous nonsense assertion carribeanjack... ;D

But all you do is repeat the same deliberate trashing of Brosnan.

all you do also is repeat the same deliberate thing, which is criticize the way i comment ;D hey you're not my professor ;D

Again, you have zero critical-thinking skills and have nothing to say except to bash Brosnan with ridiculous comments

well maybe i'm not a self proclaimed PhD kind of person like you Prof Carribeanjackass ;D, while i disagree with someone, i never insulted them with their sexual orientation. Its a shame someone like you, who very skilled in critical-thinking skills (like your stupid own claim) bring sexual orientation to discussion.

everyone here keep repeat hates for Craig, and ridiculous moment too. maybe i enter the wrong forum. This place is not alternative 007, this is another version Daniel Craig is not Bond.com.

It's actually getting creepy. It's an obsession on your part, like a homo-erotic fascination for the actor but it's turned into frustration for you because it's unrequited love. You need help, dude. But this forum is not the place to vent you homo-erotic frustrations.

again with sexual orientation insult ;D you say me being ridicolous? look at yourself bro. If you have a disagreement with someone, please don't bring your personal hate to some group, this is not the place man. (btw i am a straight guy
i hope, you with more education and knowledge better than me would be a noble person like James Bond.

This is the last time maybe i wrote in this forum, i like you guys, FBF,BJMDD,ADAM,poirot,009,TWINE,alvin, etc. although i almost disagree with all of you guys, i enjoy all your posting, ideas, or comment. sorry if my presence here not make added value to this forum...

see ya around

[poirot]

Jun 13, 2010 0:16:19 GMT -5 chuck007 said:

Brosnan is and always a mediocre actor ;D

;D now that you mention it, this really does look bad for Craig. much worse than any of us ever assumed!!! ;D

;D craig was soundly beaten by overrated film starring mediocre actors! no wonder he has started to question his own personal life decisions! (see also the thread: daniel craig gay scandal) ;D

Jun 13, 2010 0:34:37 GMT -5 FormerBondFan said:

Do you always have to come here and bother Pierce around on his acting?

Jun 13, 2010 10:45:24 GMT -5 caribbeanjack said:

Which nobody takes seriously.

Guys, there's no way posters like chuck or alvin are serious. It's fun to play along sometimes, but it's also a shtick that never changes.

;D not that I'm complaining, bro. if we absolutely have to have craig fans around, i can think of no better representatives. ;D

[FormerBondFan]

Jun 13, 2010 13:20:56 GMT -5 chuck007 said:

Dude, you're blabbing the same things over and over.

Formerbondfans also blabbing the same things over and over too about Craig, why don't you

It's Craig's Bond I don't like. I respect him as an actor. Heck....I would very much like to see him appear in Star Trek whether be a show or movie since he mentioned his desire of participating in this 44 year old sci-fi franchise few years back.

[caribbeanjack]

Jun 13, 2010 13:20:56 GMT -5 chuck007 said:

Dude, you're blabbing the same things over and over.

Formerbondfans also blabbing the same things over and over too about Craig, why don't you



well this forum is not a scientific forum, i don't even take it seriously your ridicolous nonsense assertion carribeanjack... ;D



all you do also is repeat the same deliberate thing, which is criticize the way i comment ;D hey you're not my professor ;D



well maybe i'm not a self proclaimed PhD kind of person like you Prof Carribeanjackass ;D, while i disagree with someone, i never insulted them with their sexual orientation. Its a shame someone like you, who very skilled in critical-thinking skills (like your stupid own claim) bring sexual orientation to discussion.

everyone here keep repeat hates for Craig, and ridiculous moment too. maybe i enter the wrong forum. This place is not alternative 007, this is another version Daniel Craig is not Bond.com.

It's actually getting creepy. It's an obsession on your part, like a homo-erotic fascination for the actor but it's turned into frustration for you because it's unrequited love. You need help, dude. But this forum is not the place to vent you homo-erotic frustrations.

again with sexual orientation insult ;D you say me being ridicolous? look at yourself bro. If you have a disagreement with someone, please don't bring your personal hate to some group, this is not the place man. (btw i am a straight guy
i hope, you with more education and knowledge better than me would be a noble person like James Bond.

This is the last time maybe i wrote in this forum, i like you guys, FBF,BJMDD,ADAM,poirot,009,TWINE,alvin, etc. although i almost disagree with all of you guys, i enjoy all your posting, ideas, or comment. sorry if my presence here not make added value to this forum...

see ya around

It's over for you, bro. ;D You've failed miserably in all your discussions. Just look at all the comments above...Weak comebacks, as usual. You're just basically recycling my comments.

well this forum is not a scientific forum, i don't even take it seriously your ridicolous nonsense assertion carribeanjack...

Uh-oh, somebody's truly revealing his insecurities. By the way, if you can't take this forum seriously, then get the heck out of here. You're wasting everyone's time.

see ya around

Bye-bye. And don't let the door hit on the way out, although I do hope you get some therapy for your homo-erotic frustrations. Then again, poirot's right: you can't be taken seriously. Poirot, ever witty, said it well: "not that I'm complaining, bro. if we absolutely have to have craig fans around, i can think of no better representatives." ;D